Rolling the Dice: Unraveling Proposed Sports Betting Tax Cuts & Legislation
Heading 1
Heading 2
Heading 3
Heading 4
Heading 5
Heading 6
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
- Item 1
- Item 2
- Item 3
Unordered list
- Item A
- Item B
- Item C
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript
Categories
In a surprising move, an Ohio state senator, Senator Niraj Antani (Miamisburg), recently introduced Senate Bill 190 aimed at slashing the state tax rate on sports betting operators in half, potentially reducing tax revenues by tens of millions annually. Currently, a significant portion of this revenue is earmarked for K-12 education. Per Cleveland.com, the bill proposes a reduction in the gross receipts tax on sportsbooks from the current 20% to 10%. When Ohio's sports betting program kicked off on January 1st of this year, casinos were subject to a 10% tax on gross receipts. However, the rate was later doubled to 20% in the state budget that was passed during the summer – this was, again, primarily directed to support both public and private K-12 education.Sen. Antani's proposal comes as a response to concerns raised by Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, who advocated for the increased tax rate due to what he perceived as operators crossing ethical lines in their advertising strategies. Incidents involving regulatory fines against major operators like DraftKings and Barstool Sportsbook prompted the Governor's push for a higher tax rate. The impact of such legislative changes has been evident, with Ohioans having placed bets totaling $5.2 billion on sports, resulting in $4.5 billion in winnings, translating to a net loss of $700 million. The financial implications of Senate Bill 190 remain uncertain, with the Legislative Service Commission yet to provide a revenue estimate. However, Ohio has already collected nearly $102 million in tax revenue from sportsbooks between January and October 2023. It’s worth noting that this excludes potentially lucrative months like November and December, during which the NFL, college football, the NBA, and college basketball are all in season.In an interview shared in Cleveland.com’s article, Sen. Antani criticized the legislature for increasing the sports betting tax within the state budget, emphasizing the need for a more measured approach to an emerging market like sports betting. He argued that while the increased tax may seem to target sportsbooks, its repercussions trickle down to bettors through less favorable odds and stingier promotional offers. The urgency, according to Antani, lies in reverting the tax rate to 10%, with a willingness to consider an even lower rate.The national landscape for sports betting taxes has evolved since 2018, with 30 states and the District of Columbia legalizing and imposing taxes on sports betting. As more states contemplate legalization, lessons from jurisdictions with established legal frameworks become crucial, especially in terms of tax base design. New York, for instance, hit online sports betting outlets with a hefty 51% tax rate on gross gaming revenue, serving as a prime example of the varying approaches across states.Most states adopt ad valorem (value-based) taxes on gross gaming revenue, theoretically aligning with the negative externalities associated with gambling. However, few states allocate significant revenue to address problem gambling, instead diverting the majority to general funds or unrelated programs. The challenge arises in the design of gross receipts taxes, which ostensibly target sports betting operators' gross receipts or gross gaming revenue (GGR). The complexity lies in the fact that GGR doesn't precisely indicate actual gross revenue, often including promotional bets offered by operators.Promotional bets, such as "free" or "risk-free" bets, constitute a significant portion of GGR, capturing transactions that don't involve monetary exchanges. Ohio's move to reduce the tax rate reflects a broader challenge faced by many states. A Tax Foundation study found that only a handful, including Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, allow operators to exclude specific expenses from adjusted gaming revenue. Excluding the genuine cost of promotional plays from the tax base ensures a more accurate representation of money inflows minus outflows.
Tax and Financial Insights
by NR CPAs & Business Advisors


2026 IRS Mileage Rates: Key Updates and Insights
The IRS has rolled out the inflation-adjusted mileage rates for 2026, offering taxpayers an efficient way to claim deductions for vehicle-related expenses incurred for business, charity, medical, or moving purposes. These adjustments reflect the continued economic shifts impacting car operation costs.
Effective January 1, 2026, the new standard mileage rates are established as follows:
- Business Travel: Increased to 72.5 cents per mile, inclusive of a 35-cent-per-mile depreciation allocation. This marks a rise from the 70 cents per mile rate set for 2025
- Medical/Moving Purposes: Reduced slightly to 20.5 cents per mile, down from 21 cents in the previous year, reflecting the variable cost considerations.
- Charitable Contributions: Consistent at 14 cents per mile, a fixed rate unchanged for over a quarter-century.
As is typical, the business mileage rate considers the integral fixed and variable costs of automobile operation. Meanwhile, the medical and moving rates remain contingent on variable expenses as determined by the IRS study.

It is critical to note that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) held firm on disallowing moving expense deductions except for specific cases within the Armed Forces and intelligence community, marking a substantial shift since 2017.
When engaging in charitable work, taxpayers might opt for a direct expense deduction over the per-mile method, covering gas and oil costs. However, comprehensive upkeep and insurance costs are non-deductible expenses.
Business Vehicle Use Considerations: Taxpayers can alternatively compute vehicle expenses using actual costs, which might benefit from shifting depreciation rules, particularly through bonuses and first-year advantages. Keep in mind, however, reverting from actual cost calculations to standard rates in subsequent years is restricted, particularly per vehicle protocol and when exceeding four vehicles in concurrent use.

Additionally, parking, tolls, and property taxes attributable to business can be deducted independently of the general rate, an often-overlooked advantage by many business owners.
Tax Strategies for Employers and Employees: Reimbursements based on the standard mileage framework, providing the right documentation is in place, remain tax-free for employees. Meanwhile, the elimination and continued prohibition of unreimbursed employee deductions continue, with particular exceptions offered to qualified personnel across specific occupations.
Opportunities for Self-employed Individuals: Entrepreneurs remain eligible for deductions on business-related vehicle use via Schedule C, with potential to account for business-use interest on auto loans.

Heavy SUVs and Deduction Advantages: Heavier vehicles exceeding 6,000 pounds but under 14,000 pounds open opportunities for substantial tax deductions through Section 179 and bonus depreciation avenues. The lifecycle of such a vehicle bears implications on recapturing initially claimed deductions, urging cautious tax planning.
For professional guidance on optimizing your vehicle-related tax deductions and understanding their implications on tax strategies, contact our office in Coral Gables, Florida, where expert advice and strategic insights are just a call away.


Educator's Deduction Reform: Key Changes Under OBBBA
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) introduces significant enhancements for educators' tax deductions starting in 2026, offering both strategic opportunities and planning considerations for educators who qualify. With the reinstated itemized deduction for qualified unreimbursed expenses, educators have a broader spectrum of financial relief. This is complemented by the retention of the $350 above-the-line deduction, allowing educators to maximize their tax benefits by selectively allocating expenses between these avenues.
Understanding the nuances of these changes is crucial for educators and financial advisors alike. The dual-option deduction strategy can potentially enhance tax efficiency, thereby aligning with broader financial planning goals.

At NR CPAs & Business Advisors, based in Coral Gables, Florida, our expertise in tax preparation and planning provides invaluable support to educators navigating these changes. Our comprehensive approach, combined with personalized advice from our experienced team, ensures compliance and optimization in line with the latest tax legislations.
Given these updates, it is imperative to engage with seasoned professionals to fully leverage your deduction strategies. Contact us today to streamline your tax planning under OBBBA's new guidelines and maximize your deductions for upcoming tax years.


%201.png)



.png)
.png)




