Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Michigan's Controversial Marijuana Tax: What It Means

Michigan is at the forefront of cannabis legislation controversy yet again, this time due to a proposed 24% wholesale marijuana tax which has sparked constitutional disputes. As legal proceedings begin, this case not only attracts national attention for its direct impact on cannabis pricing but also for its broader implications on voter-endorsed laws and tax policies nationwide.

Whether you're a cannabis consumer or reside far from Michigan, the outcome of this legal battle holds significance. It could potentially shape how other states construct, revise, and justify cannabis taxes, offering a blueprint for future judicial confrontations as the sector expands.

Examining Michigan's Proposal

Within the ambit of its 2025–2026 fiscal outline, Michigan legislators have sanctioned a 24% wholesale cannabis tax, aimed at accruing funds for roadwork. This levy is intended to be imposed earlier in the distribution chain, before cannabis reaches retailers.

Michigan already enforces two additional taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on cannabis retail sales, backed by voters in 2018.

  • A 6% state sales tax. Should the wholesale tax be enacted, it would result in one of the most extensive cannabis taxation frameworks in the U.S.

Image 2

Reasons Behind the Legal Opposition

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contends the proposed tax is unconstitutional, focusing on a crucial aspect:

The 2018 authorized marijuana statute cannot be altered without a supermajority vote.

With the passage of the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), recreational cannabis legalization entailed law safeguarding. This necessitates a three-fourths supermajority for any legislative modification. However, the wholesale tax proceeded with a simple majority vote.

MCIA spokesperson, Rose Tantraphol, underscored these stakes in comments to Michigan Advance:

“As Michigan’s leading cannabis trade association, we are present in court to uphold the will of Michigan's electorate.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry factions also caution that elevating costs may strain small businesses, prompting shifts toward unregulated markets—a pattern noted in high-tax jurisdictions like California (“Industry groups also warn”).

Image 3

The State's Legal Stance

Michigan authorities argue that the tax is legitimate because:

  • The wholesale levy is new, not an amendment to the voter-sanctioned 2018 law

  • The legislature holds the power to establish taxes for budgetary objectives

  • The aim is to bolster road infrastructure, not to modify cannabis governance

Should the courts align with the state's view, the tax might be implemented starting January 1, 2026.

Potential Consumer Impacts

Even those distant from Michigan should observe these events, as cannabis tax structures often have extraterritorial influences. If the tax withstands the legal contest:

  • Wholesale and retail prices might surge to offset costs

  • Some buyers may revert to less pricey unregulated options

  • Small enterprises could encounter pressures leading to consolidation

If the tax is nullified, Michigan’s current, relatively less costly tax structure would remain unaffected.

Image 1

National Repercussions of the Case

Although the legal struggle is localized, its implications are national:

1. Examining Voter-Law Constraints

This case assesses whether legislative bodies can introduce taxes sans supermajority consent, possibly reshaping ballot initiative operations across all states using such mechanisms.

2. Possible Influence on Other States’ Policies

States with inadequate infrastructure funding might replicate this model pending Michigan’s success.

3. Spotlight on the Diverse Cannabis Tax Landscape

Overall, state cannabis taxation varies extensively, with some like Oregon and Michigan having moderate rates, while states like California facing illegal market growth due to high taxation.

Michigan’s legal efforts could guide how tax challenges unfold in other states.

Next Stages in the Legal Process

The Michigan Court of Claims has reviewed initial arguments and a ruling is anticipated imminently. The issue may ultimately be resolved at the Michigan Supreme Court.

No matter the decision, it will be impactful, influencing both Michigan’s cannabis industry and broader approaches to voter laws and burgeoning sectors nationwide.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
FAQs Frequently Asked Questions
Contact Us
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully